Book Reviews: Two Recommended Books on Election Fraud

 

Richard CharninTwo leading voting sleuths are among a half a half dozen authors who have published books in recent weeks underscoring the dire threat of electronic election fraud on Nov. 6.

Today's column features two of them: Richard Charnin, right, author of Matrix of Deceit, and Jonathan D. Simon, who wrote Code Red.

My impressions:

Published a week before the 2012 U.S. elections, Richard Charnin’s Matrix of Deceit is essential to understand the voting results, and perhaps even affect them. Its publication comes at a dramatic juncture when vote thieves emboldened by past successes must decide whether to go for broke once again, or make a strategic retreat this time because the public is being roused to attention by Charnin and other advance scouts who have issued warnings.

Either way, Charnin's book and its un-rivaled compilations of presidential polling data since 1988 updated daily on his website provide necessary background. His particular specialty is mathematical analysis honed in working for the federal government’s space program and several of the nation’s largest corporations.

Ideally, relevant reporters, academics and government officials would have reported or rebutted his findings and similar ones by other independent elections sleuths who focus such related areas as investigations and history.

Jonathan SimonSimon wrote, Code Red: Computerized Election Theft and The New American Century. The author, shown at right, has delivered a book that is unique, timely, easy-to-understand, and vastly important.

The book uses an innovative Q&A format to enable readers to comprehend why electronic elections fraud represents an unprecedented challenge to democracy. The author has been a pioneering expert in this research, which has been widely ignored by traditional watchdog institutions and the political media. His book provides a convenient news-peg for them to start doing their jobs instead of continuing the go-along, get-along game.

These kinds of books and materials should be much prominent in the mainstream news reports.

Sadly, many “political reporters” tend worry most about the politics of their own newsrooms, whose managements dislike covering systematic election fraud for several reasons.

For one thing, the story is somewhat complex for a routine news story by the typical liberal arts or J-school educated reporter (although not when authors such as these explain it step by step.

Also, fraud allegations are readily dismissed with epithets such as “unpatriotic,” “sore loser,” etc., especially when a victor whose stature is suddenly enhanced takes offense at any questions.

And without news coverage, elected government officials running elections have every incentive to contract out vital vote tabulation procedures to crony contractors in the private sector, some of which have hidden ownership by party bigwigs.

Contact the author Andrew Kreig or comment
 

 

New  Books

Richard CharninGreg Palast Billionairres BookCharnin, Richard. Matrix of Deceit: Forcing Pre-Election and Exit Polls to Match Fraudulent Vote Counts, Create Space, 2012.

Fitrakis, Bob and Harvey Wasserman. Will the GOP Steal America's 2012 Election? CIJC Books/Free Press, 2012.

Kreig, Andrew with Introduction by Dr. Cyril H. Wecht. Presidential Puppetry: Obama, Romney and Their Masters. Eagle View Books, 2012.

Palast, Greg, with Comics by Ted Rall and Introduction by Robert Kennedy, Jr. Billionaires & Ballot Bandits: How to Steal an Election in 9 Easy Steps. Seven Stories, 2012.

Simon, Jonathan D. Code Red: Computerized Election Theft and The New American Century. Code Red Books, 2012.

Steele, Marta. Grassroots, Geeks, Pros, and Pols: The Election Integrity Movement's Rise and Nonstop Battle to Win Back the People's Vote, 2000-2008, CIJC Books/Free Press, 2012.

Unger, Craig. Boss Rove: Inside Karl Rove’s Secret Kingdom of Power. Scribner, 2012.

 

 

 

Related News Coverage

Michael CollinsOpEd News, Election Fraud Nov. 6, Michael Collins (left), Nov. 4, 2012. It is now acceptable to talk about election fraud in "polite company." Those who run for office to serve or care about the process of elections, despite their disappointment in the system, will have their day on November 6. Why wouldn't the immensely greedy try to steal elections?  They've stolen everything else.

Presidential True Vote/Election Fraud Forecast Model, Richard Charnin, Nov. 4, 2012. Obama: 314 expected electoral votes. He leads the state poll weighted average by 49.0-46.0%. He leads in 15 of 18 Battleground states by 51.4-48.3% with 169 of 205 Electoral Votes.

Paul Craig RobertsInstitute for Political Economy, U.S. Elections: Will the Dead Vote and Voting Machines be Hacked? Paul Craig Roberts (right), Nov. 3, 2012. The old ballot-box fraud was localized and limited in its reach. Electronic voting allows elections to be rigged on a statewide and national scale. Moreover, with electronic voting there are no missing ballot boxes to recover from the Louisiana bayous. Using proprietary corporate software, the vote count is what the software specifies. A country without a transparent vote is a country without democracy.

BradBlog, NJ Gets Paper Ballots After Sandy; FL Purges Military Voters; DoJ Deploys; GOP Voter Fraud in NV, Brad Friedman, Nov. 3, 2012. NJ Orders Paper Ballots for Powerless E-Voting Sites, (Insanely) Allows for Voting by Email, Fax; ALSO: NY, CT, PA, VA and OH polling sites struggle to get back on line after Superstorm Sandy and in time for Election Day.

538 Blog/ New York Times, Romney’s Reason to Play for Pennsylvania, Nate Silver, Nov. 4, 2012. Our model puts President Obama’s chances of winning Pennsylvania at more than 95 percent, but Mitt Romney’s alternate paths to an Electoral College victory aren’t looking a lot stronger, especially given the Democrats’ early voting advantage.

Legal Schnauzer, Article On Dana Siegelman Does Not Go Far Enough In Describing The Injustice Against Her Father, Roger Shuler, Nov. 5, 2012, One of the best written pieces on the political prosecution of former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman appears in the current issue of B Metro, which bills itself as "The Magazine of Metro Birmingham Living." Reporter Jesse Chambers focuses on Dana Siegelman and her efforts to free her father from federal prison via a presidential pardon. The article is titled "Crusade: Dana Siegelman Was Once Alabama's First Daughter, But She Will Always Be Don's First Daughter."  Chambers does a splendid job of describing the emotional and financial toll the prosecution has taken on Don Siegelman's loved ones--Dana, brother Joseph, and wife/mother Lori. Even friends and extended family members, Chambers reports, failed to grasp the evil nature of the injustice committed against Don Siegelman and his family. As the driving force behind the Free Don Siegelman Web site and petition campaign, Dana Siegelman has become the public face of her father's fight for justice.

Huffington Post, Early Voting Experience In North Carolina Bodes Ill For Civility On Election Day, Dan Froomkin, Nov. 3, 2012. If Election Day goes anything like the past 17 days of early voting in North Carolina, here's what you can expect at your local precincts on Tuesday: Belligerent citizens demanding the right to personally inspect the voting process and yelling "shut up" at the top of their lungs when election officials tell them that only official poll observers can do that. Official poll observers who have been improperly trained by the groups they represent and think it's their job to interrogate voters rather than just watch. Long lines, which means that a lot of people end up waiting outside the designated no-electioneering zones, getting harangued by campaign workers. Shouting matches between Republican and Democratic campaign workers -- and sometimes voters standing in line -- that can involve name-calling, threatening gestures, and the summoning of law enforcement. A guy driving a tractor-trailer bed filled with effigies of Democratic officials, including President Barack Obama, with nooses around their neck. The fact that all these incidents have occurred at a few, tightly supervised early voting centers is giving state officials reason to worry that things could be much worse when regular polling stations open for business.

OpEdNews, Calling Out the Left-Wing Election Rigging Denialists, Victoria Collier, Nov. 3, 2012, This article responds to the damaging attempts by left-wing journalists to deny the possibility of right-wing electronic vote tampering -- or any e-vote tampering -- particularly in the 2012 election. In the past week, Chuck Todd at MSNBC News has Tweeted that concerns about electronic voting machines are "conspiracy theory that belong in the same category as the Trump birther garbage." ThinkProgress, the left-wing advocacy and news site, posted an article with the same blanket "conspiracy theory" dismissal. And finally, Steven Rosenfeld wrote a similar opinion piece - posted by Alternet (as "news" no less) and then picked up by Salon and Snopes - to further "debunk" concerns about stolen elections. What are these journalists railing against? A flood of recent stories warning of the potential for massive computerized election fraud in the 2012 elections. In particular, the breaking news of the Romney family's financial ties to voting machine company Hart Intercivic, exposed by the FreePress.org, is so alarming that it's been picked up by many online news sources, and even Forbes Magazine.

Huffington Post, Romneyism, Robert Reich, Nov. 3, 2012. By now, in these last remaining days before the election of 2012, we have learned enough about the beliefs of the Republican presidential candidate to see them as a worldview all its own -- a kind of creed that explains Mitt Romney. Those who say he has no principles are selling him short.

Huffington Post, Early Voting Experience In North Carolina Bodes Ill For Civility On Election Day, Dan Froomkin, Nov. 3, 2012. If Election Day goes anything like the past 17 days of early voting in North Carolina, here's what you can expect at your local precincts on Tuesday: Belligerent citizens demanding the right to personally inspect the voting process and yelling "shut up" at the top of their lungs when election officials tell them that only official poll observers can do that. Official poll observers who have been improperly trained by the groups they represent and think it's their job to interrogate voters rather than just watch. Long lines, which means that a lot of people end up waiting outside the designated no-electioneering zones, getting harangued by campaign workers. Shouting matches between Republican and Democratic campaign workers -- and sometimes voters standing in line -- that can involve name-calling, threatening gestures, and the summoning of law enforcement. A guy driving a tractor-trailer bed filled with effigies of Democratic officials, including President Barack Obama, with nooses around their neck. The fact that all these incidents have occurred at a few, tightly supervised early voting centers is giving state officials reason to worry that things could be much worse when regular polling stations open for business.

Huffington Post, As Ohio Faces Vote-Rigging Lawsuit, Are Dems, Liberals, Election Officials Ready to Safeguard Votes? Art Levine, Nov. 2, 2012. There's mounting fall-out from reports, first broken by The Free Press, that a Mitt Romney-linked company owns the Hart Intercivic voting machines used in key counties in Colorado, Ohio and other states. The stories have stoked new fears about a "stolen" election. UPDATE: Those worries about a rigged election were given new urgency today as The Ohio-based Free Press editor-in-chief Robert Fitrakis, also a Green Party candidate for Congress, announced plans to file a lawsuit later today seeking an immediate injunction against Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted and the ES&S manufacturer to halt the use of secretly installed, unauthorized "experimental" software in 39 counties' tabulators in an alleged violation of state election law. His attorney, Cliff Arnebeck, has also referred the case to the Cincinnati FBI for a criminal investigation. Arnebeck says, "It's a flagrant violation of the law. Before you add new software, you need approval of a state board. They are installing an uncertified, suspect software patch that interfaces between the a county's vote tabulation equipment and state tabulators." He adds, "This is criminal conduct. If they're not doing something wrong, why are they covering it up?"

OpEd News, Will America's 2012 Election Be Stolen? Harvey Wasserman, Nov. 3, 2012.  Media Advisory: Green Party Presidential Candidate Jill Stein will speak at a noon press conference at the National Press Club in Washington, DC with voting integrity sleuths to warn against  danger to the public in the ownership and management of America's electronic vote count Nov. 6.

Pima County (Arizona), Pima Co Election Wars Testimony of Mickey Duniho, You Tube uploaded by John R. Brakey, Nov. 1, 2012 (Video 45:06 min). Michael "Mickey" Duniho, a local election official and a former NSA analyst, testified in election integrity hearing held in Tucson, Arizona. Duniho is one of 13 plaintiffs suing Pima County to get them to comply with existing election laws. He provides an excellent overview.

LA Progressive, Retired NSA Analyst Proves GOP Is Stealing Elections, Part I, Denis Campbell, October 28, 2012. Retired NSA analyst Michael Duniho has worked for nearly seven years trying to understand voting anomalies in his home state of Arizona and Pima County. Said Duniho, "It is really easy to cheat using computers to count votes, because you can't see what is going on in the machine." When Duniho applied a mathematical model to actual voting results in the largest voting precincts, he saw that only the large precincts suddenly trended towards Mitt Romney in the Arizona primary – and indeed all Republicans in every election since 2008 – by a factor of 8%-10%. The Republican candidate in every race saw an 8-10% gain in his totals whilst the Democrat lost 8-10%. This is a swing of up to 20 points, enough to win an election unless a candidate was losing very badly. Since sifting through and decoding massive amounts of data was his work for decades on behalf of the National Security Agency, he wanted to understand why this was ONLY happening in large precincts. The idea of examining large precinct results came via a link to a report written by Francois Choquette and James Johnson. Choquette became curious about South Carolina primary results in the February Republican contest. There a poll observer noted an unusually big gain of votes for Mitt Romney in larger precincts than in smaller ones. Choquette wanted to know why?

YouTube, Karl Rove’s Election Fraud Empire, Press Conference, Jim March, Jill Simpson, Dana Siegelman, Clifford Arnebeck and Andrew Kreig (Moderators), Oct. 24, 2012. In a news conference at the National Press Club, prominent election sleuths allege a plan to own, operate, and manipulate voting machine software in ways that could improperly determine the 2006 presidential election. [Note: Later removed by YouTube.]